December 13, 2008

  • We CANNOT be shown up by Pittsfield!!

    Every day I get e-mails from  the dozen or so various groups, programs, organizations, and publications to which I subscribe or belong.  Today's inbox contained a message from Democrats.com saying this:

    This weekend, Barack Obama's campaign is organizing "Change is Coming" house meetings to transfer the amazing energy and enthusiasm of the campaign over to the hard work of governing. You can search for a meeting near you: http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/changeiscoming/

    So, as usual for these announcements, I follow the link and enter my zip code - more so out of curiosity than anything else as two jobs, two young kids, and the Christmas season kill my chance of attending.  Often, the only nearby hits are Springfield or St. Louis.  Quincy is almost never represented.  Of course, this time was no different, but that was not what bothered me.  Browsing the list, I noticed several nearby smaller, much more rural communities that contained someone hosting a meeting at their home.  Hamilton (rural town of 5.5 sq mi 10 minutes from ultra-conservative Nauvoo) has a host.  Pittsfield (farming community of 4,000 and 40 mi from the next town as large as itself) is hosting one.  Macomb (college town of 18,500 people) is having one, and Kirksville, MO (university town of 16,000) is acutally hosting two of them.  Granted, Macomb's got WIU and Kirksville has Truman State, but c'mon - their combined population is still almost 10,000 shy of Quincy's, and they have a combined three hosts to our none.  While it's encouraging to see these small rural areas with such proactive citizens, I'm disappointed we weren't represented.

    Now, I have not been to any of these places lately.  Maybe they've undergone progressive shifts in recent years while Quincy, well... hasn't.  Maybe Democrats.com should have sent the e-mail more than a day before the  meetings were to take place.  Maybe people like me simply complained that no one was hosting a meeting instead of taking initiative and hosting one themselves.  Regardless of the reason, this is change that can and should be made on a local level in the coming years.

    Gotta go - my Christmas tree is falling over.

    Castle of AAAAHHHHHHRRRRR

November 26, 2008

  • Christmas Portrait Time

    Wow, this was a rough year.  Who would have thought it would be so difficult to get a 3.5 year old boy and a six-week-old girl to simultaneously hold a pose, look in the same direction, and smile long enough to take a picture of it all?  We finally got a few good ones and everyone will get a good look at the results on your Christmas card. 

    Also, anyone looking for gift ideas for me specifically can check out my Amazon Wishlist.  If looking for ideas for both Alice and I, talk to me this weekend, or give me a call. 

November 17, 2008


  • But I'm sure everything will be fine.....
    ___________________________________

    China's journey to the dark ages

    Biggest cities becoming murky as smog clouds block up to 25 per cent of sun, UN study finds

    From Friday's Globe and Mail

    BEIJING — In the skies over China and South Asia, the sun itself is disappearing. The biggest cities are becoming darker as they fall beneath a vast brown cloud of soot, and even North America is vulnerable to the drifting toxic cloud.  That's the conclusion of a new United Nations study: that warns that the smog clouds have become so enormous they could kill 340,000 people annually in China and India.

    The study says the toxic clouds - more than three kilometres thick - are contributing to a huge range of dangerous effects: extreme weather; damage to crops; melting of glaciers; the dimming of big cities; shifts in rainfall; massive economic losses; higher food prices; and a growing number of human deaths from respiratory and cardiovascular diseases.

    Up to 25 per cent of the sunlight has disappeared in Chinese cities such as Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, India's New Delhi and Karachi, Pakistan, the study concluded. In India, the dimming of cities has more than doubled since 1980, it said.  The smog clouds are also found in North America and Europe, but those are less dangerous because they tend to be removed or reduced by winter precipitation. The clouds from Asia, however, have drifted as far east as California.

    The clouds, known as "atmospheric brown clouds," are filled with ozone, black carbon, and soot particles. They are caused by a "soot stream" of fossil-fuel and biomass burning, deforestation and other man-made factors. Coal-fired power plants and rising auto traffic are among the chief causes.

    A team of scientists, commissioned by the UN Environment Programme, has been studying the toxic brown clouds since 2002. Their first reports met with considerable cynicism and criticism, but their latest report is much more detailed, prompting the scientists to issue a stronger warning of the importance of the issue.  Achim Steiner, the UNEP executive director, said he expects the phenomenon of toxic brown clouds to be "firmly on the international community's radar" as a result of the latest study, which was released yesterday. The clouds need "urgent and detailed research," he said.  "In China alone, the clouds have cost an estimated $82-billion in losses to the national economy."

    One of the most disturbing problems is the impact of the smog clouds on global warming. This happens in two ways. By absorbing sunlight and heating the air, the clouds are aggravating the effect of greenhouse gases. But at the same time, the clouds can be "masking" the global-warming trend, since they contain sulphates and other particles that can reflect sunlight and cool the Earth's surface. So any action to eliminate the brown clouds would trigger a dramatic rise in global warming, the study warns.

    The clouds could be dampening the rise of global temperatures by 20 to 80 per cent, the study said. "Simply tackling the pollution linked with brown-cloud formations, without simultaneously delivering big cuts in greenhouse gases, could have a potentially disastrous effect," the UNEP said in a statement yesterday.

    It also warned that the clouds are reducing rainfall in India and South Asia, which could "further aggravate the recent dramatic escalation of food prices and the consequent challenge for survival among the world's most vulnerable populations."  In parts of India, for example, the brown clouds - combined with global warming - have slashed the rice harvest by 6.2 million tonnes annually, which is enough to feed 72 million people, the study found.

    Another dramatic result is the melting of glaciers, partly due to the toxic clouds. The latest study found "substantial soot concentrations" in the Himalayan mountains, even up to an altitude of five kilometres. And this soot, along with greenhouse gases, is a major cause of the melting and shrinking of glaciers.  "If the current rate of retreat continues unabated, these glaciers and snow packs are expected to shrink by as much as 75 per cent before the year 2050, posing grave danger to the region's water security," the study concluded.
    ____________________________________________________________________________

    ....at least for most of us...
    ______________________________________

    Tiny island nation seeks dry land

    Newly elected President of Maldives plans to set aside funds for new homeland in case rising sea levels submerge low-lying islands

    From Thursday's Globe and Mail

    Mohamed Nasheed, who took office this week as the newly elected President of the Maldives, announced that he will establish an investment fund with some of the country's tourism revenues to buy a new home for his citizens should global warming raise sea levels and submerge their picturesque but low-lying homeland.  "We can do nothing to stop climate change on our own and so we have to buy land elsewhere," he told a British newspaper this week. "It's an insurance policy for the worst possible outcome."

    The Indian Ocean country of 1,200 sandy islands about 800 kilometres from the tip of India rises just 2.4 metres above sea level at its highest point. Mr. Nasheed said that even a minor rise in sea level will flood parts of the country and turn residents of the 250 inhabited islands into environmental refugees.  He plans to set aside some of the country's $1-billion annual tourist revenues to acquire what could be described as an contingency country.

    A former human-rights activist elected last month, Mr. Nasheed has already approached several countries - including Sri Lanka, India and Australia - about buying land, and said they have been receptive to the idea.  "We do not want to leave the Maldives, but we also do not want to be climate refugees living in tents for decades," he said.

    Hadi Dowlatabadi, a climate-change expert who holds a Canada Research Chair at the University of British Columbia, agreed that it is likely that the Maldives will one day disappear.  "It depends on how Greenland melts, but easily within a century," he said.  "If all of Greenland melts, sea level will rise seven metres, forcing the relocation of millions of people from islands and coastal regions."  But the threat to the Maldives exists even if climate change is not as drastic as feared.  Even if climate-changing emissions were stopped today, Dr. Dowlatabadi said, sea levels will rise by 1½ metres in the next 300 years.  "The Maldives have no other option but to find themselves another piece of land somewhere," he said. "This decision comes from the President's understanding that the political will to save them doesn't exist."

    In Papua New Guinea, residents of the Carteret Islands have already had to relocate because of rising sea levels attributed to climate change. Residents of Tuvalu and Kiribati are also at risk of becoming climate refugees.  In February, the Alliance of Small Island States held a press conference at the United Nations, urging international support for projects that would aid their survival in the face of climate change.

    Members of the 44-member alliance described the new reality of hurricanes, tsunamis and other weather phenomena that are already affecting their citizens, and urged the global community to adopt a "no island left behind" mentality.  But experts agree that relocation is the likeliest outcome, although the impact of moving an entire country would be devastating.

    Dr. Dowlatabadi said people are often moved when dams are built, and said the original inhabitants of the Bikini Islands were moved to another Pacific atoll when their home became an atomic testing site.  "The problem is that people never, ever recover from that relocation. It's just far too traumatic," he said. "You lose your identity, you lose your homeland and a consequence is that people tend to have very high suicide rates."

    Although Mr. Nasheed has expressed his desire to protect his citizens from becoming refugees, simply buying uninhabited property in Australia or another region does not mean that it can be declared a sovereign state.  "It becomes essentially a compound," Dr. Dowlatabadi said. "It's not a country."

November 3, 2008

  • My letter to the editor:

    On several occasions, I've read various things in my local paper to which I initially intended to respond.  However, either someone would beat me to it or the passage of time would weaken my motivation.  But last week, I read something where I was sure neither of those things would occur.  I think I made a strong case for my point, but more importantly, I felt Dawkins should be defended on general principle.  Agree with him or not regarding his crusade(!) of nonbelief, Dawkins has made tremendous contributions to the spread of scientific knowledge, whether to future scientists in his classroom or to interested citizens in his books, films, or public appearances.  In short, he didn't deserve what was written about him, and I felt I had to reply accordingly.

    Disagreement on Dawkins

    In the October 29 edition of the Herald Whig, Steve Eighinger introduced a feature entitled “Morons of the Month” wherein he singles out, from various newsworthy candidates, a “cast of idiots who stood the tallest among the stupid.” He awarded the silver medal to distinguished biology professor Richard Dawkins.  Dawkins had recently donated $9,000 to an atheist campaign in Britain attempting to raise money to place the following advertisement on a London city bus: “There is probably no god. Now stop worrying and enjoy your life”. The campaign is an attempt to make non-belief more mainstream, thus more acceptable and to further lessen the grip of religion on public life in England. Mr. Eighinger then suggests that Oxford University is paying Dawkins $9,000 too much and that while it may be okay to think that there is probably no god, he asks, “Does the whole world have to know about it?”.

    Firstly, Dr. Richard Dawkins is a professor at Oxford University where until his September retirement, he had held the Charles Simonyi Chair of the Public Understanding of Science since its inception. He is a Fellow of the Royal Society, has published over a half dozen nonfiction international bestsellers, and has done more to promote and popularize the biological sciences than anyone in the last century. In other words, it seems unfair to peg him as a moron of a slightly higher caliber than a competitive eater who ate himself to death - Mr. Eighinger’s bronze medal winner.

    Secondly, given the aforementioned accomplishments and accolades, it is not likely Professor Dawkins must rely on his Oxford salary in order to make charitable contributions. However, if British universities are anything like their American counterparts, it is more likely that “the Dawkins guy” is underpaid given his extraordinary scientific aptitude.

    Thirdly, I’m curious as to why Mr. Eighinger feels the message of the ad is uncalled for and what exactly he finds moronic about Dr. Dawkins’ actions.  Dawkins, as a private citizen, donated a resource, in this case money, to promote an organization which he supports so they can put forth a religious message with which he agrees. Doesn’t Mr. Eighinger write 3-5 stories per week singing the praises (and rightfully so) of people, many of them local, who do the exact same thing by giving their money, time, and effort to promote Christian messages? Can I expect upcoming articles calling them “morons”? Does he feel the expression of Christian beliefs on TV/radio stations, t-shirts, billboards, church marquees etc. is admirable but non-believers should not be allowed so much as a sign on the side of a bus? I do not think this is his view, as such a perspective would be unfair at best and bigoted at worst - neither of which are accurate descriptions of Mr. Eighinger or his writing. I’m sure that if asked, he acknowledges the rights of all religious groups to promote themselves, which makes his silver "Moron Medal" choice that much more perplexing.
    ________________________________________________________

    It should be further noted that on the day that Mr. Eighinger felt compelled to label Richard Dawkins a moron, Eighinger's blog featured a post entitled, and I'm not kidding - Ranking the most important pro wrestlers of our time.  And if you think that's funny/sad, check out the comments. 

    On another note - Great Saturday in St. Louis!  Beer and dinner at Tin Can followed by beer and hockey at the Kiel(?) Center (where the Penguins got goals from six different players including two assists by Crosby en route to a 6-3 win!!) followed by beer and Rock Band (I was singer/bass player) with a bonus hour of sleep from daylight savings time.
    3 Stars of the night:
    Patrick - Defended alien Penguin fan among group of friends/co-workers - humor - forgiveness for my losing the dvd he loaned me.
    Becky - Organized and coordinated the entire evening - transportation that allowed the rest of us to drink at will for the entire evening, including in the car which is legal for passengers in some St.Louis areas.
    Alice - My amazing, amazing wife that agreed to stay home with Spencer and the baby so that I might partake in this memorable night.  The best part of these trips is always coming home to you.

October 26, 2008

  • For any hockey-illiterate readers...

    No matter what the analysts tell you...

    no matter what the statistics say...

    no matter who wins what awards...

    Henrik Lundqvist is currently the best goaltender in the NHL.

    There is NO WAY the Rangers should have won this game.  Lundqvist was under fire all night and allowed two pucks to slip through, including one that zig-zagged off of two of his own teammates and one that was finally hammered in after two initial stops.  No goals in overtime and 3 for 3 in the shootout.  Performances like this are occasionial for professional goalies, but he seems to be carrying his team ALL THE TIME.  If New York goes anywhere this year, it will be primarily his doing.  His play almost made watching the Penguins blow a 2-0 lead easier to stomach.  Almost.

October 18, 2008

  • She's Here!!!!

    October2008 045  

    Erica Florence Arnold

    Full photo album - click here

    Everybody's home healthy and safe.  Spencer is a better big brother than we could have hoped for.  His favorite activity for the last several days has been to watch over her and say, "I used to have/play/wear/do that when I was a baby."  She doesn't cry much but seems to have hiccups constantly and her sleeping schedule leaves much to be desired - in other words, standard baby stuff.  This is going to be great.

September 29, 2008

  • Oh, why can't The Onion publish Point/Counterpoint articles more often - it's easily their most consistently funny feature.
    ____________________________________________________________________________________

    Point -

    Gov. Palin Has No Foreign Policy Experience, Refuses To Acknowledge Global Warming, And Supports The War In Iraq

    By Roger Hobaugh, Concerned Citizen

    Roger Hobaugh There may be no better word to describe John McCain's vice presidential pick than "ridiculous."

    After months of criticizing Sen. Obama for his inexperience with foreign policy, McCain has chosen quite possibly the least experienced woman in politics to serve as his second-in-command. How little experience does Palin have, you ask? She was a part-time mayor of a tiny Alaska town and then governor of one of the least populous states in the union for less than two years. Palin has never met with any foreign leaders of any kind—in fact, she only applied for a U.S. passport last year!

    In this time of international turmoil, how could McCain, a man who would become the oldest candidate ever elected, select a novice like Palin knowing she would be one heartbeat away from having to step into the presidency and protect our nation? The mere notion that Palin is even remotely equipped to manage the ongoing war on terror is an out-and-out fantasy dreamt up by the Republican party to disguise why they really selected her: to attract female and evangelical voters in a desperate attempt to win the election at any cost—even if it means sacrificing our nation's security.

    McCain has chosen for his running mate a woman who is so set in the past that she supports abstinence-only education despite its failure among her own children; a woman who claims she is not convinced that global warming is a serious issue. Palin has time and again supported needless and ecologically destructive drilling in Alaska's wildlife reserves—drilling that McCain himself is ardently opposed to—yet offers no plan for the very real and proven threat of climate change, despite the danger it poses to her home state.

    Perhaps the most frightening prospect of putting Palin in the White House is her continued support of the failing war in Iraq—a war she called "a task that is from God." Electing Sarah Palin and John McCain in November will no doubt prolong this costly and unwinnable conflict, which every day claims the lives of more American troops and sinks our country further into debt.

    Palin is not a bold new choice for America. I have no doubt she will provide the same type of irresponsible and flat-out dangerous leadership we've seen from President Bush for the past eight years. That is, if she provides any leadership at all.


    Counterpoint -

    Please Keep Your Voice Down, My Poor Retarded Child Is Sleeping

    By Gov. Sarah Palin, Republican Vice Presidential Nominee

    Palin Shhhh!

    Could you please stop tearing apart my record so loudly? I just put my special needs child down for a nap. You remember my poor, Down syndrome baby, don't you? The developmentally disabled child I carried to term despite knowing that he had special needs? The child who would be helpless without my constant care and attention? Well, he's just nodded off, and if you continue to provide such damning evidence of my inexperience in both foreign and domestic policy, you'll wake him.

    You wouldn't want him to start crying, would you?

    It's very rude of you to keep pointing out the myriad reasons I am unfit to be the governor of Alaska, much less vice president of the United States of America, when you know my Down syndrome–afflicted son is trying to get some much-needed rest. If you wanted to question my qualifications as a leader, you should have thought of that sooner, like, say, before I gave birth to a retarded child who would probably starve to death if I weren't so selflessly and courageously dedicated to him.

    Actually, he'll probably be sleeping for a while, so maybe it would be best if you came back later. Perhaps this afternoon, or in a couple of months. It's just that he gets so tired having to struggle with even the simplest tasks that you and I take for granted. Because my special needs son has Down syndrome, you see. My child has Down syndrome. And, as the mother of a baby with Down syndrome, I would appreciate it if you stopped bringing up my nonexistent energy plan while he sleeps there, like an angel.

    My beautiful, special needs angel.

    I assure you, I have every intention of responding to your claims. Sarah Palin does not run from a challenge. Like the challenge of raising a child with Down syndrome. That's what I've been doing for five months now, and let me tell you, it is hard work. But I wouldn't trade a moment of it for anything in the world, not even for more time to respond to the gaping holes you've just punched in my candidacy. Did I mention he has Down syndrome?

    Now, if you'll please back away quietly without saying anything else—especially about my recent comments regarding Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and how they illustrate my complete lack of even a basic understanding of our economy—I'll forget this whole thing ever happened.

    And so will my vote-stealing retard baby.
    _____________________________________________________________________________________

    Related Articles

September 18, 2008

  • The greatest science experiment ever cancelled

    Due to the much deserved hype, most have heard of the launch of the Large Hadron Collider on the Swiss/French border.  Nicknamed the "Big Bang Machine", this instrument is tagged to answer some of the deepest questions of  the universe regarding dark matter, the Higgs Boson, and the Standard Model of physics.  This is a gargantuan undertaking that is the result of years of scientific, economic, and engineering calculations.  This is a great time to be a physicist.

    But for US scientists, the feelings can be bittersweet.  After all, this should have been a local story that was written over a decade ago.

    From Wikipedia:

    The Superconducting Super Collider (SSC) is the name of a particle accelerator that was planned to be built mostly in Waxahachie, Texas. Its planned ring circumference is 87.1 km (54 miles) and an energy of 20 TeV per beam, potentially enough energy to create a Higgs Boson, a particle predicted by the Standard Model, but not yet detected.  The project was cancelled by Congress in 1993.

    During the design and the first construction stage, a heated debate ensued about the high cost of the project. In 1987, Congress was told the project could be completed for $4.4 billion, but by 1993 the cost projection exceeded $12 billion. An especially recurrent argument was the contrast with NASA's contribution to the International Space Station (ISS), which was of similar amount. Critics of the project argued that the US could not afford both of them.

    Many factors contributed to the shutdown of the project, although different parties disagree on which contributed the most. They include rising cost estimates, poor management by physicists and Department of Energy officials, the end of the need to prove the supremacy of American science with the collapse of the Soviet Union, belief that many smaller scientific experiments of equal merit could be funded for the same cost, Congress's desire to generally reduce spending, and the reluctance of Texas Governor Ann Richards and President Bill Clinton, to support a project begun during the administrations of Richards's predecessor, Bill Clements, and Clinton's predecessors, Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush. However, in 1993, Clinton attempted to prevent the cancellation by requesting that Congress continue "to support this important and challenging effort" through completion because "abandoning the SSC at this point would signal that the United States is compromising its position of leadership in basic science..."

    At the time the project was cancelled, 22.5 km (14 miles) of tunnel and 17 shafts to the surface were already dug and nearly two billion dollars had already been spent on the massive facility.

    The site is currently unoccupied. However the site is occasionally used by the military to conduct training exercises.
    ____________________________________________________________________________

    That's right.  The US was $2 billion and 14 miles of tunnel into an accelerator that would have made today's LHC look sick, and it was cancelled for the reasons stated, none of which seem sufficient to scrap the whole thing.

    So, what are the possible implications for the US's disproportionate involvement for what will likely be the most successful scientific instrument since the Hubble?  An article from the Toronto Globe and Mail states it plain:

    Collider's launch may spell end to U.S. lead in science 

    But it also marked a powerful new turn in the science wars in which the top ranks of physics are no longer dominated by the United States, which has attracted the top minds for decades.

    With the most significant physics installation in the world now located here on the Swiss-French border, employing 9,000 of the world's top physicists, and with Washington having cancelled or scaled down its funding for many of its largest physics initiatives, it is widely felt that only Europe now has the mass of funding able to attract the best minds in the field.

    More than 1,200 U.S. scientists worked on the project, and there is a sense that a great many of them will stay here. The American scientists were loath to comment on the record lest they jeopardize their grants, but most felt strongly that the United States is no longer a place to practise massive-scale experiments.

    Some U.S. science officials have begun to speak openly of the threat posed by Europe's funding lead.

    "In terms of bringing the world to the US, enabling the world to work with us to explore this physics, we certainly have taken a step back," Pier Oddone, the head of Fermilab, told a reporter yesterday.

    Budget cuts this year have closed high-energy accelerators at Stanford University and Cornell University. The world's second-largest collider, the Tevatron at Fermilab in Illinois, is slated to shut down in two years and there will be no replacement. And, as a result of disputes between Congress and the White House, the United States last year all but eliminated its funding of the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor, another of the world's largest physics projects, cutting out a major U.S. role.

    (snip)

    The fundamental research into the nature of the universe, it seems, has become too big for any one nation to afford - including, it seems, the United States.

    When federal governments change parties, or when the balance of power between the White House and the two houses of Congress changes, promised funding tends to be cut off, even if a project is halfway through its cycle.

    In Europe, governments have managed to keep funding the Hadron Collider throughout a period when most countries changed governing parties at least twice, and underwent economic downturns. This apparently larger commitment to major scientific endeavours has drawn the elite of the world's research community out of the United States and into Europe, most physicists say.
    ________________________________________________________________________________

    When I read and think about those two emphasized sentences, my stomach sinks for the future of this country and the need for a pro-science government becomes more obvious.  But as long as people don't see the problem of drilling for oil in a space specifically designated for minimal human interference, as long as nearly half the population rejects the basic fact of biological evolution, as long as talking heads and politicians manufacture doubt on climate change, stories like this will only become more commonplace. 

    "We have designed our civilization based on science and technology and at the same time arranged things so that almost no one understands anything at all about science and technology. This is a clear prescription for disaster."

    "History is full of people who out of fear, or ignorance, or lust for power have destroyed knowledge of immeasurable value which truly belongs to us all. We must not let it happen again."

                                                                                                                                                          - Carl Sagan

September 9, 2008

  • Common Ground Between Competing Fundamentalists

    This is an excerpt from an article that provides an interesting point of view that hadn't occured to me by highlighting the parallels between Christian and Muslim fanatics.  Although, it's not as though I needed more reasons not to vote McCain/Palin.

    "Palin has a right to her religious beliefs, as do fundamentalist Muslims who agree with her on so many issues of social policy. None of them has a right, however, to impose their beliefs on others by capturing and deploying the executive power of the state. The most noxious belief that Palin shares with Muslim fundamentalists is her conviction that faith is not a private affair of individuals but rather a moral imperative that believers should import into statecraft wherever they have the opportunity to do so. That is the point of her pledge to shape the judiciary. Such a theocratic impulse is incompatible with the Founding Fathers' commitment to tolerance and democracy, which is why they forbade the government to "establish" or officially support any particular religion or denomination.

    McCain once excoriated the Rev. Jerry Falwell and his ilk as "agents of intolerance." That he took such a position gave his opposition to similar intolerance in Islam credibility. In light of his more recent disgraceful kowtowing to the Christian right, McCain's animus against fundamentalist Muslims no longer looks consistent. It looks bigoted and invidious. You can't say you are waging a war on religious extremism if you are trying to put a religious extremist a heartbeat away from the presidency."

    Read the whole thing hereAlso, Effect Measure has been all over Palin's policies on community organizers, religion guiding public policy, banning books, troopergate, sexual orientation, teen pregnancy/sex education, and reproductive rights.

    On a lighter note - posthumous new comedy album from Mitch Hedberg!  He is missed.

September 4, 2008

  • If only this were required viewing...

     
    The Daily Show specializes in trapping people with their own words.  I'm always curious as to how their victims would defend themselves.  Lucky for them, they rarely have to.  As long as the ones applying the pressure are comedy cable show hosts and not the mainstream media, they can entirely ignore the problem.